SI
Savara Inc (SVRA)·Q4 2019 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q4 2019: Net loss was $31.7M with diluted EPS of $(0.72); operating expenses were $31.5M including $19.4M in non-cash goodwill impairment; year-end cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments totaled $121.8M .
- Management reported positive open‑label IMPALA data in aPAP showing sustained or improved gas exchange and patient‑reported outcomes over longer exposure, and confirmed intent to run a second Phase 3 (IMPALA 2) with continuous daily dosing vs placebo; FDA granted Breakthrough Therapy Designation for Molgradex in aPAP .
- NTM OPTIMA Phase 2a topline: 21% MAC culture conversion, none in MABSC; 14 SAEs and 3 deaths (unlikely related), prompting ongoing assessment of program trajectory alongside ENCORE CF study data .
- AVAIL (AeroVanc) pediatric enrollment will stop in Q2 2020 at ~140 vs 150 planned, with top‑line now expected early 2021; management noted potential impact on statistical power; COVID‑19 drove decision to cap enrollment and adapt conduct .
- Potential stock reaction catalysts: Breakthrough designation, sustained IMPALA open‑label benefits and clarity on IMPALA 2 design/initiations; AeroVanc top‑line timing and any updates on NTM program .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- FDA Breakthrough Therapy Designation for Molgradex in aPAP, increasing regulatory engagement cadence; “We believe this designation… is an important development” .
- IMPALA open‑label period showed maintained or enhanced improvements vs baseline in A‑aDO2, DLCO, SGRQ, 6MWD; placebo patients transitioning to active drug caught up to continuous dosing group; “data… could not have been more convincing” .
- Strong liquidity and financing: year‑end cash and short-term investments of ~$121.8M and private placement with potential proceeds up to $75M; debt refinanced in Jan 2020, positioning to fund IMPALA 2 .
What Went Wrong
- IMPALA missed primary endpoint in the double‑blind period and company decided against regulatory filing based on current data; focus shifted to definitive IMPALA 2 .
- NTM OPTIMA topline was underwhelming: MAC conversions in 5/24 (21%), none in MABSC; high SAE burden including 3 deaths (unlikely related), leading to reassessment of NTM strategy pending ENCORE .
- COVID‑19 disrupted CF studies; AVAIL pediatric enrollment capped at ~140 vs 150, with management acknowledging a few percentage‑point impact on powering and heightened operational risk .
Financial Results
*Estimates unavailable due to S&P Global request limits; Values would be retrieved from S&P Global.
KPIs (IMPALA Open‑Label and Study Operations)
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “We ended 2019 with positive momentum… additional funding… entering 2020 in a very strong cash position and able to execute on all our corporate priorities.” – CEO Rob Neville .
- “Data… demonstrated that removing surfactant… translate into a meaningful improvement in gas exchange… improvements continued after longer duration.” – CMO Badrul Chowdhury .
- “Our number 1 priority is to plan a second Phase 3 clinical study… daily dosing regimen of Molgradex compared to placebo.” – CMO Badrul Chowdhury .
- “While the results were not quite what we had hoped for [in OPTIMA]… we will continue to assess the full data set… and make decisions about the future of our NTM program.” – COO Taneli Jouhikainen .
- “As of December 31, 2019, we had cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments of approximately $122 million… net loss was $31.7 million or $0.72 per share.” – CFO Dave Lowrance .
Q&A Highlights
- Accelerated approval off IMPALA data: Company decided against filing and will pursue a definitive Phase 3 (IMPALA 2), given data shortcomings and precedent; regulatory plan centers on IMPALA+IMPALA 2 for approval .
- AVAIL powering: Reducing pediatric enrollment to ~140 impacts power by “a few percent points,” not viewed as a major impact .
- EMA interactions: FDA alignment first; EMA discussions to follow with convergent design .
- OPTIMA safety context: 3 deaths reflect severe, advanced disease; not related to study drug; efficacy anecdotes to be examined, but microbiology endpoints drive relevance .
- COVID‑19: Travel and safety concerns led to capping AVAIL enrollment; company implementing protocols and monitoring impact .
Estimates Context
- Street consensus comparisons for Q4 2019 EPS and revenue are unavailable due to S&P Global request limits; Savara is pre‑revenue and Q4 included a $19.4M non‑cash goodwill impairment, materially affecting EPS .
- Given the decision to forgo filing on current data and invest in IMPALA 2, we expect Street models to shift OpEx/milestone timing and extend timelines; AeroVanc pediatric enrollment reduction may slightly lower Phase 3 power and extend top‑line to early 2021 .
- Estimates unavailable; Values would be retrieved from S&P Global.
Key Takeaways for Investors
- The aPAP program regained momentum: open‑label IMPALA data show durable and improving efficacy across gas exchange and PROs; IMPALA 2 design clarity (continuous daily dosing, DLCO primary) reduces execution risk .
- Regulatory path de‑risked by Breakthrough Therapy Designation and plan to run a definitive confirmatory trial; expect increased FDA interactions .
- Liquidity is strong to fund near‑term priorities; financing up to $75M and $121.8M cash/short‑term investments provide runway for IMPALA 2 and ongoing programs .
- NTM program is mixed; MAC signals are modest and absent in MABSC, with significant SAE burden—wait for ENCORE CF data before ascribing value .
- AVAIL remains a potential 2021 catalyst; expect ~140 pediatric enrollments due to COVID; top‑line early 2021; monitor statistical power and efficacy signals .
- Near‑term trading implication: headlines on IMPALA 2 initiation/design, further publication of IMPALA open‑label data, and any COVID‑related operational updates likely drive stock moves; medium‑term thesis hinges on successful IMPALA 2 execution and AeroVanc readout .
- Risk monitoring: regulatory feedback shifts, trial operational risks from COVID‑19, and capital allocation across three late‑stage programs should be tracked closely .